Privatize Government????

Was reading Yahoo web today and saw this article.
Copied. (Link to original)

Raised the question in my mind;
Why can’t Methuen investigate the cost of all city services?
Assume they were privatized.
Then either bring the municipal budget in line with that or actually privatize the functions?
Read the story and decide for yourself.

Maywood, California, lays off all employees
Tami Luhby, senior writer, On Thursday July 1, 2010, 8:00 am EDT
Tiny Maywood, Calif., laid off every single one of its city employees on Wednesday.
But that doesn’t mean the city is closing up shop. City Hall will still be open, as will Maywood’s park and recreation center. Police will continue to patrol the streets.
They just won’t be staffed by Maywood employees. The city can’t have any staff because it can’t get liability or worker’s compensation insurance for them. Maywood’s carrier, the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority, dropped it earlier this month in part because of several police-related claims.
Instead of declaring bankruptcy, Maywood officials decided to outsource all city functions. The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department will patrol the streets, while the neighboring city of Bell will cover other city functions, such as staffing City Hall.
Maywood already relies on contract workers and outsources many city services. The director of parks and recreation, for instance, is a contractor, and the city’s lights, landscaping and street sweeping are handled by private companies. Los Angeles County maintains the library and fire department.
Some of Maywood’s 96 employees — which include 41 police officers — will also continue as contract workers. Elected officials, such as the city council and the city clerk, will remain on the job in the 1.5-square-mile municipality, which has about 45,000 residents.
“Odds are residents will see the same faces as in years past, just under a different administrative process,” said Magdalena Prado, the city’s community relations director, who is a contract worker and is keeping her post.
Maywood is billing itself as the first American city to outsource all of its city services. In an odd twist, officials say it can provide even better services because the shift will help it save money and close a $450,000 shortfall in its $10 million general fund budget.
For instance, the contract with the sheriff’s department costs about half of the more than $7 million spent annually to maintain the Maywood police department, Prado said. And patrols will be increased.
“Our community will continue to receive quality services,” Mayor Ana Rosa Riso said in a statement. “Maywood’s streets will continue to be swept, our summer park programs will continue to operate and our waste will be collected and hauled as scheduled.”
Stressed cities
A growing number of cities are looking to contract out or share services regionally as the economic downturn takes its toll on municipal budgets.
“Everything is on the table,” said Chris Hoene, research director at the National League of Cities. “The fiscal stress cities are feeling mean they are looking for alternative options to deliver services that cost less money.”
Some 7 in 10 city officials said they are cutting personnel to balances their budgets, while another 68% are holding off on capital projects, according to a survey the league did in May. More than half of respondents say they will make to further slash city services next year if taxes or fees are not raised.
Not everyone is distressed by Maywood’s unusual plan for providing city services. While Jesus Padilla feels sorry for the workers being affected, he thinks things might improve. He’s made lots of calls to the county sheriff’s department when he worked as a security guard and said officers always responded promptly.
“The council made the best decision it could,” said Padilla, a local activist who has lived in Maywood for more than 30 years. “It’s going to be good for the city and the citizens.”

Methuen-Accreditation

Lot’s of discourse about High School Acreditation.
Most of it was emotional rhetoric aimed at firing up the crowd.
Politicos are not giving straight information to the public.
They are relying upon emotional appeals instead of factual information.
They are either looking at the sound bite or what will fire the anger of the crowd to force action.
This is a huge expense over a number of years.
The High School is not currently in danger of losing accreditation.
Each year we garner more and more college grants and scholarships.
A failing school, generally, sees these numbers declining not rising.
So, if you read the paper, or listen to the school administration, we are at least adequate academically.
There is a criteria for Building evaluation. It is listed in the Support Section;COMMUNITY RESOURCES FOR LEARNING (All the standards are listed here:http://cpss.neasc.org/)
Here is a copy of the section. Items 3 through 8 are the applicable sections.

Active community and parent participation, facilities which support school programs and services, and dependable and adequate funding are necessary for the school to achieve its mission and expectations for student learning.
1. The school shall engage parents and families as partners in each student’s education and shall encourage their participation in school programs and parent support groups.
2. The school shall foster productive business/community/higher education partnerships that support student learning.
3. The school site and plant shall support and enhance all aspects of the educational program and the support services for student learning.
4. The physical plant and facilities shall meet all applicable federal and state laws and shall be in compliance with local fire, health, and safety regulations.
5. Equipment shall be adequate, properly maintained, catalogued, and replaced when appropriate.
6. A planned and adequately funded program of building and site management shall ensure the appropriate maintenance, repair, and cleanliness of the school plant.
7. There shall be ongoing planning to address future programs, enrollment changes, staffing, facility, and technology needs as well as capital improvements.
8. The community and the district’s governing body shall ensure an adequate and dependable source of revenue to provide and maintain appropriate school programs, personnel, services, facilities, equipment, technological support, materials, and supplies for student learning.

9. Faculty and building administrators shall have active involvement in the budgetary process, including its development and implementation.

There are 10 Massachusetts High Schools on the Probation list. The oldest on the list,since 1999. Though Methuen saw a note in our accreditation report in 2003 and, I believe, also in 2006, no official action has been taken to place this School on Probation.
Rule changes will take effect in 2011.
We will be re-evaluated next in 2012.

I understand that a loss of accreditation is a blow to a community.
Methuen has been trying to be proactive to stave off any adverse actions to accreditation.
Bringing this up in the current debate is counter-productive.
It simply diverts your attention from the important parts of the debate-COST and the following questions;
Is the upgrades purpose clear? Will this ensure the health, safety, and well being of students and school personnel.
Does the upgrade address a specific and existing problem, interest, or need?
Is the upgrade designed so that it is not redundant or duplicative of any other Federal, state, local or private effort? Most school construction is financed through local tax revenue, often through the use of bonds. What is our total Bonded Indebtedness over the usefull life of this project?
Is the upgrade design free of major flaws that would limit the program’s effectiveness or efficiency? What is our practical capacity to issue bonds. What is the percent of their bonding capacity?
Is the upgrade design effectively targeted so that resources will address the program’s purpose directly and will reach intended beneficiaries? What is our major need for facilities imporvements.

MEA Culpa

Again, at last nights (05/10/2010) School Committee meeting we heard a rehash of Ms. Donna Gogas original Lawrence Eagle Tribune Letter to the Editor.
Here is my unpublished response to that Letter.

To the editor
Re:Letter: Story confuses public on teachers’ pay

I don’t think the public is as confused about teachers pay as Ms. Gogas would imply.
Whatever terminology one uses in a contract discussion is not relevant to the facts. The public is pretty clear on it’s understanding that no matter what you call it, teachers are getting an increase in pay in a time of economic downturn. They are receiving money that is more than they received in the previous year, budgetary or calander. To the general public that is a raise. Most in the private sector, if they still hold jobs, are forgoing any increases in pay through this time. Unlike the teachers. No matter what industry one works in it is assumed that one would keep there skill set up to date and sharp. If this is mandated or not, it is required to get good reviews which assist a company in retaining employees or releasing under performers. I don’t see similar discussion for teachers. It always leads to unrelated sidestepping instead of substantive discourse on how to measure a teachers true job performance.

I do not buy the short term reference to this downturn, either. Any ecomomic recession that lasts from 2007/8 for two plus years, with no end in sight, is not a short downturn.

The teachers union leadership fails to grasp the reality of performance measurement, economic downturns, student performance role and economic sacrifice. Until this situation corrects itself we shall not be confused nor amused by their “masterful degree” of bluster.

Reading is fun and mental!

I came across this in the meeting notes for the Methuen School Committee.
They are required to vote on School Choice each year.
These are the minutes from TRANSCRIPT OF PUBLIC RECORD OF THE METHUEN SCHOOL COMMITTEE BUSINESS SESSION OF May 12, 2008.
I transcribed exactly as record states. (Simple cut and Paste)
Please read this and determine if the unanimous vote is for or against school choice?
*NEW BUSINESS:
A. 2008-2009 School Choice Program
Dr. Whitten asked the Committee to accept the 2008-2009 School Choice Program.
The Education Reform Act of 1993 presumes that each school district will admit non-resident students under the School Choice Program unless there is a vote by the local School Committee not to participate in the program.
Due to severe space and class size restraints, Dr.Whitten recommended that the Methuen School Committee vote not to participate in the School Choice Program for the 2008-2009 school year.

MOTION: Robert Vogler made a motion to accept the 2008-2009 School Choice Program.
Kenneth Henrick seconded.

VOTE: 7-0-0 UNAMINOUS

So did we accept or reject school choice based on the meeting minutes?

2010 Census Return Rate

How well or poorly is your neighborhood doing at returning United States Census Forms for 2010?
Want to Know?

This is from the Census Bureau; It is updated daily.

The Census Bureau 2010 slogan is TAKE 10.

Check here; City Map

If you enter your zip code, a map will appear.
It is color coded and shows the return rate for Census Forms for Census Areas in your zip code.

Have you returned your form?

Make sure you count.
It means money to your local government and more importantly to the programs that help people most in need of asistance.

Census Bureau website. for more Information.

Thinking about Unemployement

As the City begins looking at another bleak budget forecast and negotiations with it’s labor unions, let’s hope they keep these numbers in mind.
The State of Massachusetts Executive Office of Labor and Workforce Development, Division of Unemployment Assistance has released the latest data on unemployement for all of Massachusetts and the Cities and Towns therein.
The seasonally unadjusted numbers for Methuen are no better than anywhere else.
The unemployement rate for February 2009 was 9.8%. The rates for January and February 2010, respectively, are 12.7% and 12.4%. Percentages are great but what does that mean in human, person, terms?
Looking at the same dates as above 2,292 persons were unemployed in February 2009. In the period of January and February 2010, the number of persons unemployed was, resepctively, 3,068 and 2,963.
Though it shows a slight uptick,about 105 people found work, there are still large numbers of your friends and relatives who are looking for jobs that don’t exist. It is a difficult time for many of these people.

The unemployement rate for Municipal workers in Methuen is near zero(0). They receive pay increases, contractually, just for showing up. They cannot be rated by performance for raises and promotions. They effectively do not get laid off and we have seen that the weak Civil Service Commission assures that no one gets fired, no matter what the reason.

The elected officials made much of the rhetoric that ALL departments took a 10% pay cut last year. Don’t get me wrong, the unions did step up and make assurances that helped balance the budget. However they did not all take a 10% pay cut. They did give back some longevity, clothing allowances and other perks that may or may not have equalled 10% per union.

Wait until the overtime is calculated for last year. My guess is that you will not see that our government spent 10% less than it initially budgetted. I would be very suprised to see that the Government spent any % less than the original figures.

Did the City work on any grants to help the unemployed citizens get back to work? They got grants for municipal employees.
Did they renegotiate property taxes for unemployed persons to either waive or carry forward or reduce or make payment plans?
Did they state that they would not shut off water for unpaid bills to unemployed persons while they were receiving unemployement payments from the state? Not that I recall.

The City should hire all the unemployed people in it’s borders. Then with full employement all the revenues will go up. The amount of revenue generated should be sufficient to continue down the path we have been trodding. Hmmmmmm, isn’t that a kind of circular logic or illogic?

Kind of makes one think.

Talent Bank redux

At a recent Methuen City Council meeting there was discussion on two topics that dealt with appointed boards.
During these discussions on appointments two “issues” seem to always crop up.
One issue is a quasi-distinction between paid boards and unpaid boards. The second issue is about board vacancies.

Boards, by statute are boards. there is no distinction in the Municipal code between paid and unpaid. Though one can reqeust an interest in any board, the application does not list which are paid and which are not. This argument crops up and is truly moot, except in the mind of the arguer. Appointment is appointment and the rules for how one applies and how one is chosen does not make any distinction between boards.
The reality is that some boards do receive a stipend for service. One will not get rich serving on these boards.
Let us put aside this specious argument.
From an appointee perspective, there is no difference between boards and thus rules should apply equally amongst all the boards.
Any vacancies are not a result of the appointees not coming forward. the problem is that the rules to advertise hold a clause that makes it unworkable. Thus, the administration and the legislative branch of City government ignore the rule.
Instead of changing or updating the rule to make it compatible with the reality of the day, they ignore it.As stated in the meeting there are board vacancies. There are also, talent bank applications on file. We do not know how many are on file still. The administration does not discuss that information. We are not privy to how long these applications are kept on file. We do not know why, if there are vacancies and applicants for positions, no action is being taken?

Through Freedom of Information requests I can confirm that the City website does show 19 Boards and Commissions, as stated. That is not all the Boards and Commissions. Only the ones that the City chose to mention.
On these Boards and Commissions are 114 positions. Of these positions only 9 are vacant at the present time. That is 7.89%. This percentage is lower than the Cities unemployement rate. I know that at least one position could be filled with my application which has been on file with the Mayors office since his first election.

Speak!

Favoring Small Government

Growth of Belief in Small Government

The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government.

Patrick Henry

excerpt from Henry David Thoreau’s essay’s “Resistance to Civil Government.”

I HEARTILY ACCEPT the motto, — “That government is best which governs least”; and I should like to see it acted up to more rapidly and systematically. Carried out, it finally amounts to this, which also I believe, — “That government is best which governs not at all”; and when men are prepared for it, that will be the kind of government which they will have. Government is at best but an expedient; but most governments are usually, and all governments are sometimes, inexpedient.
But, to speak practically and as a citizen, …, I ask for, not at once no government, but at once a better government. Let every man make known what kind of government would command his respect, and that will be one step toward obtaining it.
After all, the practical reason why, when the power is once in the hands of the people, a majority are permitted, and for a long period continue, to rule, is not because they are most likely to be in the right, nor because this seems fairest to the minority, but because they are physically the strongest. But a government in which the majority rule in all cases cannot be based on justice, even as far as men understand it. Can there not be a government in which majorities do not virtually decide right and wrong, but conscience? — in which majorities decide only those questions to which the rule of expediency is applicable? Must the citizen ever for a moment, or in the least degree, resign his conscience to the legislator? Why has every man a conscience, then? I think that we should be men first, and subjects afterward. It is not desirable to cultivate a respect for the law, so much as for the right. The only obligation which I have a right to assume is to do at any time what I think right….

Have you made a statement of the type of government that you could believe in?
The Charter Commission is waiting to hear from you.
Do NOT let a handfull of elected persons decide the course of your government. Be vocal. Be heard.
Submit what you believe to be in the best interests of Methuen to the Commission.
In Person, By Mail, By email. stop the members on the street and state your conviction.

We await your comment.

Mayoral Vehicle Policy [MVP]

Giovanni Boccaccio (1313 – 21 December 1375) was an Italian author/poet and an important Renaissance humanist. One quote from him is “Do as we say, and not as we do” .

P1010047

Mayoral Car parked at Searles Building

BY HIS HONOR WILLIAM M. MANZI, III MAYOR
EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 019-2009
ORDER REGARDING CITY OWNED VEHICLES
WHEREAS, The City of Methuen has been experiencing a worsening financial crisis and is expecting to face more cuts in State local aid and declining revenues; and
WHEREAS, immediate
measures must be taken to insure that Methuen remains on sound financial footing and is able to provide necessary services to all of its citizens;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, William M. Manzi, III, Mayor of The City of Methuen, by virtue of the authority vested in me as Chief Executive Officer hereby Order as follows:
1. With the exception of the Mayor, Police Chief, Fire Chief, Director of Public Works or his designee, no city employee is allowed to take a city owned vehicle to his or her residence overnight for any reason.
2. All employees who drive a city vehicle during the course of their employment must park that vehicle in a city lot at the end of their shift. Failure to do so will result in disciplinary action up to and including termination of employment.
3. This order shall take effect on January 1, 2010 and shall remain in force indefinitely.
Given this 22th day of December 2009.

The above order is an addendum to a previous order quoted here;

BY HIS HONOR WILLIAM M. MANZI, III MAYOR
EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 013-2008
ORDER ESTABLISHING A CITY-OWNED VEHICLE POLICY
WHEREAS, The City of Methuen is committed insuring that city-owned vehicles are used responsibility and efficiently;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, William M. Manzi, III, Mayor of The City of Methuen, by virtue of the authority vested in me as Chief Executive Officer hereby establish a city-owned vehicle policy and Order as follows:
1. City of Methuen personnel, approved by the Mayor, who are assigned take home city-owned vehicles may park their vehicles at their place of residence at the end of each work day, provided that their place of residence is within 10 miles of the City limits (NOTE: Contractual). All other vehicles will remain on designated City property after working hours. NOTE: see EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 019-2009 above
2. The Mayor shall receive monthly, an analysis of the total amount of gasoline used and the mileage used by each city-owned vehicle.
NOTE: Freedom of Information Requests for this data reveal that the Mayor receives phone calls on the status and not any formal report, as may be implied by the statement..
3. All vehicles owned by the City of Methuen shall be lettered with the City of Methuen seal, as well as having municipal plates. (NOTE: Unless you are the Mayor?) All undercover, unmarked and surveillance public safety vehicles are not required to be lettered and may have standard plates.

P1010049 City Owned Car

Mayoral Car:No Municipal Plate

City Owned Car

Mayoral Car:No City of Methuen seal

4. City-owned vehicles assigned to approved personnel shall only use these vehicles while on official City business. Under no circumstances shall a city-owned vehicle be used for personal or private uses. No city-owned vehicle shall be taken on vacation by any employee. Only approved individuals shall operate said vehicles in carrying out their official City duties.
5. All assigned personnel shall show due diligence in regard to minimizing travel to and from job sites and shall not leave vehicles idling.
6. Misuse of a City-owned vehicle or any violation of this policy by any employee of the City of Methuen shall be just cause for discipline up to and including dismissal of said employee.
Given this ____ day of May, 2008.

Does a literal reading mean we can discipline the Mayor or terminate?

That was enlightening but sometimes if you read deeper into things you find;

THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF METHUEN, MASSACHUSETTS 2000
CHAPTER 6A – PERSONNEL ORDINANCE – MAYOR
Section 6A-6. Automobile Expense
The City of Methuen shall reimburse the Mayor for the expense of operating his/her own vehicle for City business in the sum of Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) per month, as a flat fee. Provided further, that no additional mileage shall be paid by the City for the use of his/her vehicle. If the Mayor’s car is out of commission for one month, he/she shall be allowed the use of a City vehicle for that period, but he/she shall not be paid the $200.00 allowance for that month.

I asked under freedom of Information, do we pay the Mayor for the use of his personal vehicle?
No per City Auditor.

My question becomes why aren’t the Councilors looking at items such as these and making corrections. How long does an Executive order last? The term of the Executive who places the order or forever? My take would be it is permanent, based on Federal and state precedent. This should be addressed in the Charter or in the Municipal Code.

I could suggest that the Municipal code be updated to state the Mayor gets no payment per the code if the City provides a vehicle that conforms to Charter, Code or Executive Order. The payment shall be at a rate similar to the Federal reimbursement rate and the Mayor must submit mileage reports to receive payment. (Do away with flat rate fees)

It actually is cost effectve to give the Mayor a vehicle based on numbers received from the City as to cost of Vehicle usage for the past 2 years. [That does not account for appropriation costs of the vehicle, only gas and mileage charges]

*All Photos taken March 9, 2010.*

Flood Plain Action Plan-one view

I have been extremely remiss this month. Not one post. That does not mean that I have been neglectfull. Just busy.
Flooding is still on my mind. Another flood event has just come and gone in the past week. Many times I have been asked what can be done? Lot’s of people think the City should do more for flood victims. There is some truth to that but not in the way most people perceive the Cities role.
Here is my email to my councilors. I ask for two items to be considered.
Dear Councilors,

The flooding is ending, again. The Red Cross has moved through the neighborhood passing out cleanup kits.

The City will soon start to add up all the associated costs and make a determination of how close can we get to the Federal eight (8) million dollar mark to qualify for cleanup funds.

I live in a flood plain. Here are the Historical Crests for the Spicket River.
(1) 12.14 ft on 05/16/2006– Mothers Day Flood.
Major Flood Stage:12 ft
Moderate Flood Stage:10 ft

(2) 9.86 ft on 3/16/2010
(3) 9.07 ft on 03/24/2001
(4) 9.04 ft on 04/18/2007
National Weather Service Flood Stage:9 ft
(5) 8.83 ft on 04/03/2004
(6) 8.53 ft on 02/27/2010
United States Geological Survey (USGS) Flood Stage:8 ft
(7) 7.54 ft on 05/27/2005
(8) 7.52 ft on 10/16/2005
(9) 7.02 ft on 03/09/2008
(10) 6.53 ft on 03/23/2003
USGS Action Stage:6.5
(11) 5.70 ft on 05/18/2002

Why do I send this information? The answer is simple.

The data shows that every year since 2000, the Spicket has flooded our neighborhoods. The only exception is 2009. The response has always been to total up the City costs and apply for federal funds.

I ask that we become a bit more proactive.

I ask that the most flood prone roads n my area;

Canobieola Road, west of Venice Road for about 200 feet (to the mailbox in front of 45 Canobieola;

Cross Street at the Old pumping Station (where Harris Brook meets the Spicket) and

from Danielian Way ( about 60 Cross Street) to about Pelham Street (near 32/34 Cross Street)

be placed on the Capital Improvement Plan.

I would like these areas re-designed to avoid closure during flood stage. This would allow residents a means of ingress and regress during flood events and reduce the cost of police and fire services during flooding in the long term.
Basically raise the roads above the flood water and provide water flow under these raised roads. This would reduce the closures and use of DPW workers and Police in these areas, each year.

In the mean time, before we can afford to implement these improvements;
I recommend that the Emergency Management and Police and DPW get together and create a volunteer group ( or paid at costs less than patrol officers) of Flood Wardens. Their task would be to put out,under the direction of these departments, the closure saw horses and barrels and in place of police, monitor all flooded streets, allowing two benefits.
The first would be allowing the police and DPW to focus on their currently assigned jobs.
Secondly, it would reduce the costs to the City and not impact public safety adversely.
The concept is similar to flagmen at construction sites but in this instance these persons would be deputized to patrol flooded streets in place of more expensive police.

I thank you for your consideration of my proposals.

I am always available to further discuss these proposals.

So, dear reader, what do you think. Isn’t the role of the City to provide for the Commenweal of it’s populace?
Even understanding that the City, via its own zoning rules and zoning overrides, has had a hand in the flooding, I only ask that the City provide a means of escape from flood water for persons in these flood plains. The City should contain it’s costs by using lower paid personnel or volunteer persons to man the flood gates at streets that become impassable.
I do not ask for the impossible, only the expediant and, over time, most probable actions that the City can take.
These actions can be taken in any location of the City that suffers from annual flood events. I only list my area, as that is what I am most familiar with. Similar action should be contemplated across the City to mitigate the City cost while providing a means of escape for persons who live in these areas.